>>16342448I honestly have to give you a little bit of credit, the amount of wonderous bait you've managed to create is something to be admired.
>I won't dignify you by getting very madSo instead you're going to dignify me by stating that you either are actually mad, or are keeping yourself from getting mad because you would feel upset to admit that I said something that upsets you.
>but I guess I just meant whenever 4chan and emoticons started to mixI don't think you realize how emoticons work. There was no "mixing," there was never a time when the majority of people here "liked" emoticons.
> I wasn't exactly here for the beginning, but I've more or less been here for a long while.This means nothing other than that you're trying to convey that you have no idea what the hell you're talking about
>Circa 2006 4chan is best 4chan.Oh did you pick up that hot steaming opinion from /b/?
>that really only applies if you have a fuckhuge reaction image folder>not having a fuckhuge reaction folderIt's like you're new or something, except you already said that. Heaven forbid you decide to contribute something and
create a reaction image. But that would require you to not only do minute's work in MS paint, but more importantly require you to THINK. Something which you have not shown yourself to be good at.
