>>16383931>>16384106>>16384272>>16384286The human art was definitely Toriyama plagiarism but the Pokemon art really wasn't like that, beyond the watercolor-esque look.
I like the new art but the old art certainly has this 90s charm to it. I think what I really liked about is that the old art generally has more dynamic poses than the new art. Compare the Ivysaur in my post to the one in the OP. New Ivysaur is just...kind of standing there, while the Old Ivysaur looks like he's about to attack.
If you think I'm just cherrypicking, compare for yourself
>>16384317. There are some exceptions (Old Pigeotto and New Pidgeotto are in the same poses, for example) but generally this is the case.
