[19 / 3 / ?]
Quoted By: >>16666970 >>16666987 >>16666989
I don't understand normal type. It seems like a Pokémon is "normal"type if it's not anything else (fire, grass etc)
So if that is the case, shouldn't all pure types be part normal?
Let's say you have a dragon, and we let it it fly. Dragon/Flying. Or, we make it a ghost: Dragon/Ghost. But what if we add nothing special to it? It stays "Dragon", while it's actually a normal dragon.
Also, why doesn't normal just have nothing special to it? 1x damage from everything, 1x damage to everything
So if that is the case, shouldn't all pure types be part normal?
Let's say you have a dragon, and we let it it fly. Dragon/Flying. Or, we make it a ghost: Dragon/Ghost. But what if we add nothing special to it? It stays "Dragon", while it's actually a normal dragon.
Also, why doesn't normal just have nothing special to it? 1x damage from everything, 1x damage to everything