>>16791753They do, but it's done solely on principle. If a Pokemon is an event legendary or a cover legendary, then it's banned. No questions asked. A rather silly way of determining what gets banned.
>>16792015>>16792103I'm personally not upset, I just think it's amusing you've formed an unchangeable opinion on something without doing any research on it whatsoever. If someone bashed a TV show without ever actually watching it, you would think them to be stupid, would you not?
ps Don't try to pull "i-i-i was just saying it wasn't fun ;-;" because you were also making accusations towards people. That's not an opinion.
>>16792130The difference is that you don't need to use a team like that to succeed. Yes, a lot of people use that team, but those people are just unoriginal team thieves. There are plenty of viable Pokemon you can use and thousands of different teams you can use. Hell, the top tier players don't even use that team.
Compare to a metagame where Mega-Khan is unbanned, because then you'll either need a sableye or half your team holding Rocky Helmet to stand a chance, because Mega-Khan is just that powerful.
