/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #17002087

[19 / 4 / ?]

165KiB, 688x496, 458Mantyke[1].png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:31:18 No.17002087 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>17002099

Why have there been no new baby Pokemon since Gen IV?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO c21316fejwwfehj.png, 82KiB, 218x289

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:31:57 No.17002099 Report

Quoted By:

>>17002087

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:32:16 No.17002107 Report

Quoted By:

Because no one cares about/likes them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:32:53 No.17002119 Report

Quoted By:

Because they're worthless and everybody hates them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:33:49 No.17002138 Report

Quoted By: >>17002187

why does mantyke even exist, what the heck

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:36:23 No.17002181 Report

Quoted By:

incenses are dumb

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:36:47 No.17002187 Report

Quoted By:

>>17002138
To have one of the lowest capture rates and give us diabetes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:37:12 No.17002197 Report

Quoted By:

Mantine
>This Pokémon has no moves exclusive to prior evolutions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:37:52 No.17002207 Report

Quoted By:

To give us 3IV wild babymons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:41:13 No.17002258 Report

Quoted By: >>17002268

Because no gens have expanded on any previous lines before (sans Sylveon and muh megas). GEN 7, PLEASE, STOP THIS MADNESS.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO tumblr_mb43kjTIIH1rw7u8ro1_500.png, 93KiB, 500x317

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:42:00 No.17002266 Report

Quoted By:

>mantine gets a pre evo
>its physical counterpart that came out the same generation doesn't

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:42:15 No.17002268 Report

Quoted By:

>>17002258
*no gens following 4th

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:43:23 No.17002279 Report

Quoted By:

babymons are shit

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:45:13 No.17002308 Report

Quoted By:

I hate how most of them don't add anything to their evolution lines. Seriously, what's the point of shit like Happiny or Chingling?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:49:02 No.17002369 Report

Quoted By: >>17002439

>Rufflet could have been a babby
>Vullaby could have been a babby
>Petilil could have been a babby
>Cottonee could have been a babby
>there could have been a Throh/Sawk link babby

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:50:50 No.17002405 Report

Quoted By: >>17002432

Because gamefreak realized that baby pokemon are worthless and add nothing to the game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:52:08 No.17002432 Report

Quoted By:

>>17002405
thank you, yes

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 16:52:36 No.17002439 Report

Quoted By: >>17002658

>>17002369
THAWK

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO thawk_hawk_dive.gif, 47KiB, 576x576

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2013 17:03:38 No.17002658 Report

Quoted By:

>>17002439

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches