>>17104868Things like preferences in colors are social constructs, Maternal Instinct and sexual drive are deep rooted biological constructs that came about due to the benefits it brings to the species. Not to mention that there's a difference between presenting facts and butchering them for the sake of a strawman simply due to the fact that a vocal minority has pushed concepts you don't like.
I hate radical SJWs as much as the next guy, but we shouldn't be willfully ignorant to the things that could be possibly valid in the opposition's arguments.
>>17104892Nowhere did I say that someone who has an XY chromosome isn't biologically male. All I said was 'you can't look at someone's face and be sure if they've got XY or XX'. If I took a girl and gave her a constant stream of testosterone, she'd eventually start looking masculine, eventually reaching a point where people may think she's male, despite the fact that by the genetic standard, she is a female.
This isn't "BAWW, YOU HURT MY FEELINGS WITH FACTS!", this is 'If you're going to say presence of the Y chromosome is the defining factor of someone's sex, then you had better be getting a DNA test on everyone, because there's plenty of people who don't look the sex they are for some reason'.
Think of it this way: I'm a blonde by genotype, but I dye my hair black to the roots. You can't tell I'm a natural blonde without a genetic test. It's as simple as that.
