>>17177101>So if it's not Boom Boom, Shrekle, etc. then it's automatically good?Where did I imply that? I was talking about originality/how often it's picked.
>I think what oldfags want is something that's original but can still function.I'll assume by this post that you're not an oldfag yourself. In any case, Duosion can function since his Sp.Attack is the same, albeit it's much harder to play with (I'm not cruel/stupid enough to pick Solosis - I love him, but he would be toast).
>Right, but the wouldn't the point of suggesting Duosion be useless then?I suggested Duosion with Evolite - the rest was up to him. Champ could have given him Physical, but he didn't. If you get a champ that doesn't know the first thing about Pokemon, all Pokemon would be worthless suggestions (unless specifically spelt out by suggestors).
>Nope.My mistake, Anon.
>Duosion is pretty underwhelming.>Why'd you suggest it in the first place?I'm not sure if you're attacking or just genuinely curious, but either way, the answer is in
>>17176158. Again, I have suggested several good Pokemon for champ, OU or could stand a chance. Reuniclus is one of them. Every time he's suggested, Champ seems to not understand how the Pokemon works. The suggestion was supposed to be humorous; since Champ can't into Reuniclus, give him a "mini-version" and claim it's the next best thing.
