>>17259815>>17259768Alright kids, Mewtwo theory, so hold your fuckin' pitchforks til I'm done, alright? I'm just laying things out the way I choose to accept them, you can give yours after I'm done
Ok, so we know of the Mewtwo created by Fuji, the one that was in Origins, the one in The First Movie and in Mewtwo Returns. Check. For all intents and purposes, let's refer to HIM (him on account of VA Dan Green) as Kanto (for its native region), and the Mewtwo in Legend Awakened (and the one found in X/Y) as Kalos.
Now, cloning is not an easy task. I'm no geneticist, but I can only assume that even professionals with decades in the field would still struggle, I mean, you are playing God, after all. SO, what does Giovanni do? He sets up multiple labs, all over the globe, each one working on their own clone efforts, following one uniform schematic on the alterations to Mew's DNA. This would explain why both Mewtwos have the same appearance. As for the voice, my ultimate theory is that the original Mew is female, based on that it was said that all other Pokemon were birthed from it. So there was the option for chromosomal change, which was applied to Kanto but not to Kalos. On the Premise of Mega-Evolution, we've seen from both Origins and the Legend Awakened that in both universes of the Pokemon continuity that Mewtwo is capable of Mega Evolution, that hasn't changed, and it can be assumed (and apparently confirmed from the poster for Cocoon of Destruction) that either one can evolve either way. So this says that there is no impedance by either on the other's existence.
So really on the whole, everything is fine when it comes to two Mewtwos existing in the same universe, the movies were never really considered canon of each other anyways, with the exception of TFM and Mewtwo Returns, so the continuity isn't disrupted either. Is this a solid theory? Does it have facts to back the claims? Enough that the counter would only have the same info to go on. Your thoughts