>>17537116this list is shit.
real list with reasoning
>charizardit's a dragon, cool, but its not dragon type, it has terrible moves and it also has a fat beer gut. great.
>meganiumonly because feraligatr is amazing and typhlosion is good. i like meganium.
>sceptileonly because it has a bad stat spread for its movepool, design wise i love all 3 of the starters for hoenn. one of the best group of starters
>empoleonhow can you not like torterra or infernape? here's my biggest problem with empoleon: it's fucking HIDEOUS. and why does a penguin become a steel type anyway?
>anyThey are all bad and they are all shit. Emboar is the least shit of all 3, but they are all shit. Samurott is shit because it's a disappointing final evolution for oshawott and dewott, and serperiors entire line is awful after snivy. I don't even know the name of snivys first evolution. Emboar is only shit because it is fire/fighting again. If it had been fire/dark or fire/ground, it would have been a lot cooler and one of my favorite fire starters. as it stands though, its the 3rd fucking fire starter in a row to be fighting type. bullshit all around in gen 5.
>Gen 6 not having the best group of startersIt's hard for me to not like any of the starters since I am a fan of RPGs and I've played as a classic rogue, paladin and mage, so all 3 starters have cool designs and I love the thinking behind it. My least favorite is Chesnaught though, just because it is not good competitively, yes delphox has a useless ability in Magician, but Blaze isn't bad and it still has a decent movepool.
And it's not fire/fighting. Finally.
