>>17541375As someone who previously would have opposed you and now agrees, allow me to clarify my point:
I still think that $5 a year for a service that will provide me with significant convenience isn't that big of a deal, when I make that much money of a couple minutes at work. If that's a significant sum to you, you're clearly poor as fuck.
My stance has now changed, though. If, after all this delay, they still expect me to pay for this service, I'm going to be pissed. The service that should have been a convenience has become a nasty stain on their reputation, and I will be outraged if they try to just sweep this under the rug like nothing happened.
So I agree that it's too much for what it is now, but only because that's a PR fuck-up, not because the price is unreasonable.
