>>17791901Not him but you're dancing around the issue. Just because that guy doesn't know BST calculation doesn't invalidate the claim "genesect has enormous satk" with the proper download download. His argument for the claim may be faulty but the claim itself hasn't been debunked. You keep pointing out his mistake but avoid disputing the main point.
If you had shown him his argument was mistaken and then his dispute his main claim with your own argument, you'd be done by now. Now that he corrected himself and started using stat value rather than base stat, can you 2 please go on to the main point. Is 588 functional satk high or not?
>>17792005What he wants to point out is that Genesect with download isn't 180 base stat but around 205 if I'm not mistaken. It's not 120 x 1.5. It's stat value x 1.5. Using an satk neutral nature, 339 *1.5 = 508.5 which is around 205 base stat according to the showdown calc.
Yes, he wants to say it's even higher than what the guy who claimed "Genesect's satk is enormous" initially claimed and that because that guy said 180 instead of 205, everything the guy said in automatically invalidated.
