>>18102078Honestly, having two "Pokemon cannot act for XX rounds" conditions is stupid, especially when one is too mechanically broken to have more than a 10% chance of occurring. Frostbite seems more interesting, since most of the trouble comes from not switching out.
Besides, a good amount of the secondary effects that target the foe are Status ailments, which obviously wouldn't apply to Frostbitten Pokemon. Plus the "removed by Fire" thing could stay in place, and might lead to some interesting shenanigans with a Frostbitten Pokemon using Will O' Wisp on a foe with Magic Bounce.
