/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #18248263

[12 / 4 / ?]

52KiB, 500x250, INTOTHETRASHITGOES.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:11:52 No.18248263 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>18248351

Why does Garbodor get so much hate? I understand that it is a trash pokemon, but I personally love the design

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:20:34 No.18248351 Report

Quoted By: >>18248829

>>18248263
I love it too. Even caught a shiny Trubbish in BW and it's my bro.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:24:57 No.18248396 Report

Quoted By:

Another garbage lover here. It's a decent spiker, fairy smasher and it's literally a hunk of garbage. What's not to like?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:31:30 No.18248451 Report

Quoted By:

People hate it because it's based on trash. People seem to think they it was somehow a mistake that they designed Garbodor. Like somehow it was an accident that it were created. But really, it's based off of trash. It's just a little more obvious that Muk.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:36:52 No.18248504 Report

Quoted By: >>18248537

I like garbador's design, hate that it basically does nothing well. There's no reason to run it over another poison type, much less over a more effective mon. Poor guy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:40:07 No.18248537 Report

Quoted By:

>>18248504
This. Why can't Garbodor be as viable and awesome as Weezing? ;___;

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:41:58 No.18248560 Report

Quoted By: >>18248581

It's drawn like shit. People compare it to Muk as though that's a valid comparison. Muk is drawn very well, detailed shading and volume and definition. Garbodor's art is too simplistic, it's almost impressionist.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1376538503684.gif, 109KiB, 200x200

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:43:26 No.18248581 Report

Quoted By: >>18248631

>>18248560
>Muk is drawn very well, detailed shading and volume and definition.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:44:38 No.18248601 Report

Quoted By:

I don't mind it, I've always hated muk and grimer more, they're way shittier in terms of design

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Pokémon_Grimer_Muk_art.png, 60KiB, 313x177

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 18:46:45 No.18248631 Report

Quoted By:

>>18248581

>b8

are you blind or stupid or both?

muk is very well drawn for a pile of sludge. it has a simple design and detailed artwork. garbodor is the opposite. it's actually a problem with a lot of newer pokemon, they lack shading and definition and their features look pasted on like stickers instead of part of their body, like garbodor's face.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 19:02:41 No.18248829 Report

Quoted By:

>>18248351
Caught a shiny Garbodor in friend safari. Such a nice shiny.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1376455044765.jpg, 14KiB, 240x320

Anonymous Tue 25 Feb 2014 19:07:10 No.18248887 Report

Quoted By:

I usually don't do the whole "overdesigned" criticism, but that's definitely the problem with it. trubbish looks cool but garbodor is just an ugly clusterfuck

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches