>>18273962But sure as hell, with democracy, they WILL beat the game - The answer is already fated the moment you implement a voting system where the number of people who want to complete the game and make the right move outnumber the others against it tenfold and more.
Also, both of those goals are the exact same thing. Anarchy was the default option, and only got it's name because of the democracy implementation.
You seem to sound like one of those ''durr my democracy is better than your anarchy!!11'' guys, and that's exactly why this stream went to shit the moment it got overly popular.
Let me reiterate: ''Can multiple people work together to beat a game at the same time''
Answer: Yes, the moment you put in a voting system full of people who WANT to beat said game as soon as possible, then yes, the game will be beaten.
The hypothesis is already proven the moment you give them an option that takes Twitch delay into account and gives them a fucking voting system.
It got popular in the first place for a reason, and that's why the original systen should still be in place 24/7
But essentially, I don't care, the stream got old fast and now it's overun of le funny maymays and I might pop in once every couple days just to gain a glance at where they are.
