>>18614450>citationsWhich is the issue since I dont think ANY company, ANY has to publicly say that they didnt create genitalia for their characters for lower esrb rating since its already fucking implied. People of a certain age, the only age they want knowing, would fucking understand this. Besides autists anwyays
>What implications?The fact that leaving two of the opposite gender together alone makes eggs.
I was arguing for the reasons why they werent shown, regardless.
If you REALLY want to kee going with that thing about genitalia not being shown. then whos to say pokemon
dont all have cloacasAnd finally, do you REALLY want to see pokemon walking around with big shafts inbetween their legs to get it through to you, that as animals of the pokemon world, they have sex of some kind?
