>>18653152Thank you for confirming it was never suspect tested anon, that is much braver than most people on either side of this argument was willing to do (since the shitposting on both sides was too fun to say what we all clearly knew).
It isn't broken, but it is more restrictive to developing the meta out of centralisation than not having it.>>18653199I noticed that myself, and there were two possibilities:
1) I accidentally deleted the post (which would normally have taken me to a post deleted screen, which it didn't unless moot has changed that recently).
2) Some mod accidentally/deliberately removed that post for whatever reason.
Honestly, If there were any posts I would be deleting it would have been
>>18653068 since while I still feel it was the most appropriate response to what it was replying to, it was still a fairly petty comment on my part. Claim a victory when there is one to claim, not when some weird shit happened and that person openly admits it.
Thanks for screencapping it, I was debating whether I should do so myself to keep it in the discussion or if a mod was trying to stop the discussion from happening. 
