>>18726832>for a reason. it's gross, it's potentially dangerous, and if you can't differ between familial love and lust there's something wrong with you. >it's grossSubjective. I don't see an issue if two people, who give consent and are sexually attracted to each other fucking is gross.
>potentially dangerousHow? Diseases? Pregnancy? Normal sex has those issues too. Retard babies? It's called using protection. And that risk only goes up with multiple generations of incest. Law-wise? Consent is given.
>gross>dangerousThose are reasons that people use against gays
>and if you can't differ between familial love and lust there's something wrong with you. But, as I explained above, there is a distinct separation between lust and familial love. Incest doesn't have to mean there's a romantic relationship. FwB are a thing, and it would work the same way with incest.
>surprise you can like someone without wanting to fuck them. you can love someone without wanting to fuck them.Sex =/= love. Lust =/= Love. Wanting to fuck someone because of their physical features =/= love.
