[117 / 19 / ?]
Quoted By: >>18724283 >>18724353 >>18724375 >>18724414 >>18724512 >>18724574 >>18724634 >>18724699 >>18724703 >>18724911 >>18725049 >>18725671 >>18725715 >>18727566 >>18727780 >>18741535 >>18741570 >>18745189
It's no secret that Pokemon is a terrible game to play competitively, shit has more RNG than Hearthstone and Dota 2 combined.
How would /vp/ change Pokemon versus to make it actually balanced, hence something that can actually be taken seriously and not a luck-based casual game for children?
I'll start with the obvious
>Remove IV's
>Remove EV's
>Remove critical hits
>Make all damage static (no range of variation)
>Remove Accuracy
>Remove anything that has a % chance to work
How would /vp/ change Pokemon versus to make it actually balanced, hence something that can actually be taken seriously and not a luck-based casual game for children?
I'll start with the obvious
>Remove IV's
>Remove EV's
>Remove critical hits
>Make all damage static (no range of variation)
>Remove Accuracy
>Remove anything that has a % chance to work
