>>18922000I don't see how describing something that looks masculine as a he, rather than an it, means I'm sexualizing it. It's a fucking Pokemon, who cares? I can call Machamp he, she, or it. The analysis would still be the same. I can call a Gardevoir he, she, or it. The analysis would still be the same. I can call a Dragonite he, she, or it. The analysis would still be the same.
That's why it's irrelevant.
