>>19176240I'm having a hard time believing you're not just a troll since you're being this stupid, but I'll indulge you. You say here
>>19176037 that gen 5 has more detail than XY because the giant pixels arn't noticeable on a small screen (Which is bullshit because almost everyone noticed it), which isn't fucking relevant because regardless of how shitty gen 6 is without AAing it's still more detailed than gen 5 because gen 5 looked fucking horrible any time the camera moved. It is not more fucking detailed if anytime I zoom in I get a face full of boxes.
I point this out, and you go HURRR STRAWMAN. Are you sure YOU know what it means?
If you were going to criticize Gen 6 for something, it should be the shit framerate.