>>20349084Did you even read what I said? I said you can disagree, but you're being completely retarded and irrational.
>IF I CALL PEOPLE CASUALS/UNDERAGE I EXPECT MY STATEMENT TO GO UNCHALLENGED!I'm not the same person.
Frankly you were saying that there is no challenge, so you're the one calling everyone else casuals. It seems like you who expects to call everyone casuals and expects to not be challenged.
>that was never my point>my point always was that you can't reduce the challenge of something that contains no challenge to begin withThat's still what you are claiming. There was a SLIGHT amount of challenge in the older games, if you honestly can't see that I pity you.
The changes do matter, did you even play the fucking game?
>I don't care about the main game, therefore no one is allowed toThis is you.
Also why are you so buttblasted by that first post? Did him implying that people like you who defend to death the casualization of Pokemon are underaged offend you? He even said in the fucking post that the games were fun despite this, yet that seems to go right over your head.
>>20349114I can't tolerate stupidity, if I don't say something he will go on thinking that he's right. Plus, everyone else has bitched out.
