[18 / 2 / ?]
Quoted By: >>20394052 >>20394168 >>20394205 >>20394222
You can say I'm bending over for GF, but these leaks are pretty great
>M-Loppunny
GF isn't pandering to furries--they never have and never will. Furries aren't as significant or populous as you might think. Yes, they inflate popularity of certain pokemon that are humanoid and have potential to be sexualized, but those pokemon are always popular anyway. The reason Lop got a mega is because it's popular (furries are a subset of that, yes), not purely because people fap to it.
And if you asked a normalfag, they wouldn't say it's sexual at all, or they'd say it's a play on playboy bunnies without actually being lude or suggestive, like the original. If you think it's actually sexual, you're the one with a problem.
>M-Altaria
It's great, even though its stat spread isn't enough to make it good. Fairy/Dragon is great both competitively and conceptually
>M-Salamence
Here's the deal--what separates GF from shitty fakemon artists is that GF actually does creative shit. Every single time GF makes a pokemon that isn't generic lizard #433885, people rage at first and then once they get used to it, they love it or at least tolerate it. That's because rather than judging the design on its merits, you say "this is a little obscure" or "this body shape is weird" and take the opportunity to fling shit.
In my opinion, M-Salamence is aesthetically pleasing and its design makes perfect sense conceptually, optimizing its dream of flight. You may have different taste than me, and that's fine, but consider for a moment whether you actually hate this thing or if you're just jumping on the bandwagon because a creative/risky design is an easy target
Also May a qt
Now that I've said my piece, feel free to call me a faggot
>M-Loppunny
GF isn't pandering to furries--they never have and never will. Furries aren't as significant or populous as you might think. Yes, they inflate popularity of certain pokemon that are humanoid and have potential to be sexualized, but those pokemon are always popular anyway. The reason Lop got a mega is because it's popular (furries are a subset of that, yes), not purely because people fap to it.
And if you asked a normalfag, they wouldn't say it's sexual at all, or they'd say it's a play on playboy bunnies without actually being lude or suggestive, like the original. If you think it's actually sexual, you're the one with a problem.
>M-Altaria
It's great, even though its stat spread isn't enough to make it good. Fairy/Dragon is great both competitively and conceptually
>M-Salamence
Here's the deal--what separates GF from shitty fakemon artists is that GF actually does creative shit. Every single time GF makes a pokemon that isn't generic lizard #433885, people rage at first and then once they get used to it, they love it or at least tolerate it. That's because rather than judging the design on its merits, you say "this is a little obscure" or "this body shape is weird" and take the opportunity to fling shit.
In my opinion, M-Salamence is aesthetically pleasing and its design makes perfect sense conceptually, optimizing its dream of flight. You may have different taste than me, and that's fine, but consider for a moment whether you actually hate this thing or if you're just jumping on the bandwagon because a creative/risky design is an easy target
Also May a qt
Now that I've said my piece, feel free to call me a faggot