>>21231509wrong. psychologists tend to know more about observation than non-psychologists. You know, it's something that comes with the hour wasted in lectures
To point out that I know a bit more about attachment in general is nothing more than a well-educated observation.
>>21231570>he's a psychologist therefore he's always right - which doesn't make any senseI made no such claim. It was an appeal to authority, but that's life - we hope to trust those who suggest they know a bit about their subjects 'I'm a mechanic, blah blah blah', often and usually backed up with some relevant knowledge.
It doesn't make me right, but it helps to get an idea about where I may have obtained my information.
