>>21287342I thought you were smart enough not to continue with insults but yet here we are. You still haven't admitted you made a mistake but I gave up on that.
The post that started all this was about how "it would be nice if it was like this." From the very start, it was about a post regarding preference. Then somewhere in your head, you thought this was about fucking spikes and parroting that opinion that /vp/ has. You're the one who brought your agenda about "spikes and design and /vp/" to this whole thing, not me. You even admitted how you'd call it out because it annoyed you. You ranted about how removing spikes was horrible because they were functional.
I then pointed out that people can still not like something or prefer something else (hence me pointing out they could do something else that fulfills the function of buffing up its upper body) despite knowing its function. I even said I liked the wings which surprise, also had spikes. You then continued your rant about spikes. Your agenda, not mine.
See this guy?
>>21287301He prefers if Charizard had bigger more powerful arms since "they look weak as fuck." That's his choice and not mine though I personally would like to see that too. I'm not skilled enough in photoshop so I just posted the nearest thing some other guy made that was close to what I liked.
It had the wings with spikes I liked, it didn't have the particular spikes I didn't like, it also had a color which I liked. That was it. I never said it was bad design to add spikes (I like spikes) and make its upper body look bigger. I never argued against adding something to buff up its upper body, I even agreed. You were the one who started arguing out of false assumptions and me explaining I didn't think that way.
It's funny because I never even called it edgy. I wanted its black color. I liked its wings. I wanted it to have a bigger body but just not those particular spikes. And yet here we are.
