>>21381601I remember when ducks used to be good. You only needed one to convey confusion because kids were smarter back then. Now you've got a bunch of braindead "twitters" that need to have a fuckton of ducks crowding up the page to penetrate their thick skulls. I miss Gen 1 confusion.
>>21381612I ain't writing aggressively, child.
Perhaps you're just too sensitive.
>>21381625>You're not proving what you saidIt's an image.
What do you expect me to do, trace the person who took that screencap and take a journey across hundreds of miles just to ask them how their Gastrodon got burned, all those years ago?
>>21381633You should make pictures/
