>>21415891>fanart>of a platformEmulative illustrations cannot be considered art, definitively. That is why it is cancerous.
You have to be some sort of incompetent goon to specifically and exclusively attempt to reproduce someone else's work at all in lieu of actually doing something at all, but for that work to be character designs (which are completely, conceptually contradicted by the self-assessed 'artists') brings about an even greater level of deplorability.
Those other home.coms for the integrity-deprived are surely worse than a site that is known instead for it's population of self-righteous 16-32 year old, ugly women with inferiority complexes, purely due to their being able to atleast imitate 'art' properly as opposed to these so-called 'fanartists'.
tl;dr no such thing as 'fanart'
>>21416020Yeah.
