>>21480596>How can it be "a little suggestive but not too suggestive" if it's also "pretty clear?"that's what we're debating. It's actually pretty clear to me but I also understand why the dialogue is portrayed as such.
The problem here is that anons refuse to believe GF would add this dialogue in intentionally for people to interpret when companies have been adding this kind of thing into games/media for years and years now. Especially JP companies who are conscious of the demographics they attract
If you don't see it, it's because you're not inclined to seeing it
but if you do see it its because you ARE inclined to see it.
Both are canon because that's how the companies want it. Keeps all players happy and buying
