>>21674015>not understanding that I clearly explained that the anon in question was spouting unqualified nonsenseThe only, singular, Pokémon line that isn't an example of excellent conceptual design is that of Vullaby/Mandibuzz... And they're still pretty well designed.
>>21674097Oh no, it is what it's supposed to be.
>Pokeballs are literally balls to capture pokemon inOH NO! WHAT A TRAVESTY!
>>21674561>implyingA design exists as a communicative device and Alakazam is successful in its role as well. Jesus, learn to use your eyes
>>21674562It's not a T-Rex, but is a good design, yes.
Why do people try to dismiss things they don't understand, while refusing to gain an understanding of the subject? I'd love to know
