>>21694988>>21695086Okay, I'm out of the loop for the day here, but I gotta ask:
Is this seriously the main piece of evidence your using to deny the fact the data that was mined was incomplete?
You know, I could believe that not all info was put in the demo code
But you know what else?
(too lazy to quote the posts) LACK OF FUCKING EVIDENCE DOESN'T PROVE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
I could believe that not all the info is put in, I wont really pick a side here since I thought it was crazy all the data could be in the demo code with all the mining that happens, but I also find it odd how much code is available, but if anybodies idea of evidence is one line from the anime where hey could just as easily be talking about future gen megas and/or how these ones we get now are new and technically unknown to us in games, or that the Blaziken with the Ice Punch on the website can prove all of this because there's no chance one word could be mistranslated (and Christ, who actually believes a fire type STARTER would get an ice move? even with all this aside that sounds retarded), then your a fucking idiot. I don't want to let down faith either, but I think in any situation loosely interpreted or easily mistaken information shouldn't be your proof, and a lack of evidence should be even less of an argument.
tl;dr: Your a fucking jackass if you think such small pieces of loose evidence easily proves anything.
