>>21876837>burns for days>defog>wide guard>tailwind>haze>helping hand>no utilityi know you're supposed to know nothing about your favorite and cry that it's shit but come on
>>21876856stunfisk has neither bad stats nor a bad movepool
garbodor doesn't have a bad movepool. seriously, it's more believable that it has bad stats.
what's weezing outclassed by?
shiftry doesn't have a shitty movepool.
>barbaracle's inaccuratewut
>saying that trevenant is good but m-pinsir isn'tare you stupid or something
purugly doesn't have any of those things, it's just not that great
what's exploud outclassed by?
>>21878409bet you wish it has 15 spatk and 200+ atk, huh
>>21878680heh