>>21924044Let me break it down for you. Because my logic is not full of fallacies like yours.
You start off by saying it implies that there is a different world with different evolutions. Which may or may not as well have Megas.
You say may or may not with the megas, but I really didn't pay any attention to that part. The part where you say it implies different evolutions. And you said that everyone else was wrong. Or that other people seemed to not get it. Which isn't the case. You're just extrapolating. Of course other people won't get your particular extrapolation without you telling them.
We really don't know what it implies other than there are alternate universe. You implied it is.
>"the evolution of Pokemon took a slightly different path, where Mega Evolution is unknown..." Which clearly implies it took a different evolution path than mega evos and regular evos before megas. If not it would be a different path. Which is why I imply maybe instead of megas, pokemon that we know that dont have a secondary or third evo line did. Hell even 4th evo lines instead of mega evos. Cause "Mega Evolution is unkown..."This is just bad logic.
>"the evolution of Pokemon took a slightly different path" Evolution doesn't have to refer to the pokemons evolutionary lines themselves. It can mean how they interact with humans. And how the two grow and bond. RSE have a different story and pokemon did develop differently with people. It doesn't need to imply more than that.
