>>22163372Yes. That still takes time, believe it or not.
You're just under the impression that everything needs to be 100% logical and consistent to flow. It doesn't. It never has been, nor does it need to be.
If a minor description of a move is slightly off, and is continuously slightly off (thereby implying a knowing trend) to fit a situation where something might benefit, then it's fine.
You people are freaking out over the most insignificant of shit.
>>22163380You do if you're playing fucking Pokemon.
Also damn son, can you get anymore dramatic about it?
>>22163398If you had any bearing on the metagame, that'd be a fucking no brainer.
Charizard X having access to Dragon Ascent and V-Create is a hell of a lot more damning than a BL-worthy Pokemon getting a typically-powered move with slightly higher BP than it's alternative.
I know balance might not be your strong suit, but leave that shit to people who know it.
