>>22253394>>being a contrarian just for the sake of argument.Aww, is 'contrarian' babby's first big word? There are no other times at which one could be a contrarian if not for the sake of an argument. You're basically suggesting that it's stupid to be a footballer if all you're going to do is play football.
Secondly, the fact that you're suggesting that I'm a contrarian at all is kekworthy. Am I opposing a significant majority? Nope, most people on here have nicknamed their prized pokemon. As you can see in
>>22253371, I genuinely think it's silly not to name something you consider 'prized'.
