[11 / 3 / ?]
Quoted By: >>22677518 >>22677539 >>22677558 >>22677584 >>22677628
>Bulbasaur Isn't Neccesarily The First Pokémon
>Trivia time! Which Pokémon came first? The answer may not be what you think.
>According to the Pokedex, the answer seems clear-cut: Bulbasaur, the cabbage-like Pokémon, is number one. So it's gotta be the Pokemon that comes first, right? No, actually. The "first Pokémon" varies depending on how you look at it, and what criteria you use to determine the first Pokémon. Pokedex-wise, yes, Bulbasaur is the first Pokemon; it comes before all others. But that's just an arbitrary number, isn't it?
Mind fucking blown.
http://kotaku.com/bulbasaur-isnt-neccesarily-the-first-pokemon-1681406035
>Trivia time! Which Pokémon came first? The answer may not be what you think.
>According to the Pokedex, the answer seems clear-cut: Bulbasaur, the cabbage-like Pokémon, is number one. So it's gotta be the Pokemon that comes first, right? No, actually. The "first Pokémon" varies depending on how you look at it, and what criteria you use to determine the first Pokémon. Pokedex-wise, yes, Bulbasaur is the first Pokemon; it comes before all others. But that's just an arbitrary number, isn't it?
Mind fucking blown.
http://kotaku.com/bulbasaur-isnt-neccesarily-the-first-pokemon-1681406035
