>>22694468Anon. Anon, anon, anon. What the ever loving fuck are you thinking?
>if something is leaked before its official release, its leakedYou are correct. Yes, information leaked before that information was officially meant to be revealed is, by it's very fucking definition, a leak.
>My point was thatNo. That's not your point. That's not what we're arguing. You're saying something SPECIFIC was leaked, and you have literally nothing to back it up. You're not offering us any screens, any sites, any thing at all about Lucario vs. Blaziken being revealed before August 17, 2013 at the Pokemon Show 2013.
Going off of what you've said, you're saying those two fakes up thread are leaks, because they came out before information was officially released. They're not. They're fakes, in no way related to official production of Pokken Tournament aside from deliberately trying to APPEAR that they are.
You're now also saying image related was leaked before it was officially shown to the public. I have found absolutely no record of this any where. When people reported on the retrospective, no one ever mentioned anything related to seeing it before. I'm sure /vp/ would've jumped on it, but there's nothing.
Again, if this 5 second teaser was leaked before it was shown on August 17, 2013, there should be proof. Saying it was leaked it not falsifiable, because you can always claim "well, it's out there somewhere. Prove a negative anon."
Luckily, me saying it wasn't leaked is falsifiable. All that needs to be done is showing someone talking about the screen not in the context of it being shown at the 2013 show before August 17, 2013, or whenever exactly it was shown. Until then, the logical thing to do is assume you're full of shit and making claims you have no intention of proving or backing up.
