>>22762003Amung the rest of the posts debating about how the thread should die, that post stood out as a clear attempt to bump this thread which should fall off or get deleted. If you just want to have Gardevoir be appreciated, you wouldn't attempt to have these threads banned.
>>22762008These threads are painfully obvious attempts to get Gardevoir threads deleted, and I don't understand how anyone else can think they aren't. The last thread was literally one poster bumping a thread with no content everytime it hit page 9 for over a day, even AFTER everyone clearly stated the thread should fall off. I've still got it open, and I can more than easily prove that.
>>22762051While I don't have the picture on my, the mods of /vp/ have previously stated that threads like these are fine as long as they aren't daily. It's not a global rule, and it's not a board rule, but it's clearly being enforced with the threads recently being deleted. Or have you already forgotten about the Dawn threads?
>>22762067It will be in a good week or so when these threads aren't at risk of getting banned.
