>>22968127>no more new pokemonthis is a completely different kind of terrible for me. i continue to play because i want to see new ideas, different takes and perspectives on old typings or previously used concepts. i enjoy the diversity, finding patterns among species and think of how and why certain species appear similar despite being geographically isolated or genetically/taxonomically disparate, imagining how ecosystems function by unrelated species functioning with the same niche (in "lore" and not in competitive)
no more new pokemon could only mean they will be forced to try fusion, ultra mega super evolutions and fuck them up again by giving them only to the already powerful and popular pokemon
