>>23053814The thread spam has been a problem for a lot longer than the weekly idea was put in place, but that honestly doesn't sound like a bad idea, even if it's little more than hopeful optimism. Only problem is trying to convince those who would derail threads not to.
Regardless of the spam over the past few days that should hint at giving it a break for a few days
>>23053356 , let's see if we can have a peaceful thread, see what happens, and go from there.
>>23053840They did stop people complaining about previous threads, but it didn't stop other threads from being created. I do agree with you not wanting these threads gone, but there has to be a better way to go about it other than a weekly thread, which didn't get terribly good results.
