>>23201784Obviously, the whole point of that thread was finding niche uses for shitmons. I'd say it was an interesting read, but of course anyone reasonable wouldn't use them.
How much truth is there to the whole '/vp/ likes to use shitmons' thing as described in
>>23201753 though? Is it an actual board-wide problem or just a loud minority? I don't frequently browse /vp/ but something like that sounds as if some anons should just play lower tiers instead.
