>>23277303RB: 6/10 they were above average games at the time. Glitched to all hell, but what wasn't then?
Y: 2/10 what the fuck
GS: 4/10 major improvements over the first two but many steps back. Most new pokemon are post game, the level curve is ass etc.
C: 4/10 same as above, even relative to GS there were major improvements, not in anything that makes the game itself fun though! Battle tower gives a point.
RS: 1/10 What a fucking insult. Still salty. One point for contests and secret bases.
FRLG: 5/10 Eh, no one asked for this but it was technically needed because RS were so fucking retarded no backwards compatibility my ass. Sevii island very good. Otherwise just a remake.
E: 6/10 Most issues with RS totally solved, introduction of the frontier, wonderful addition. Still just above average GBA game.
DP: 2/10 is gamefreak going to fuck up the start of every gen now? Slow, glitchy, unbalanced in game and SLOW. Music is alright unlike the GBA soundfont. One point for online.
Pt: 7/10 Amazingly fixed most the slow issues, added not just a new frontier, but an entire post game ISLAND. Box legend climax is simply the best in the series, one upped emerald there. In game balanced a lot with many new pokemon in the regional dex. Solid. Quite above average DS game.
HGSS: 5/10 Pokethlon gives a point, and a point for being incredibly comfy. Otherwise retains all the issues of gen 2 somehow which is beyond retardation. Safari zone is alright.
BW: 5/10 Bit short, plot is a-ok addition, new pokemon out the wazoo (some not great) and not absolutely fucking it up like RS. Its pretty nice. Average DS game.
BW2: 6/10 Something different, always good. No frontier, but we have the PWT instead. It's alright, not a substitute by any stretch of the imagination. They're all just dry battles really. Improves on BW significantly, and has a fairly hefty post game.
No comment on gen 6 till its over.