>>23408977>fairy type alomomolaHas no supporting point.
>fairy type minun and plusleDedenne is enough and has more fitting theme. They are part of the Fairy field like Pikachu but it is better rappresented in their movepools.
>fairy happiny lineEat shit.
>fairy sawsbuck lineLiterally why. Explaun this nonsense.
>fairy volbeat and illumiseSolid point, either Bug/Fairy or Bug/Electric.
>retyped into fairy legendariesEat shit. Pokemon that already have aignature moves of the type you want to sub with Fairy already should be a full stop. Especially the lake trio and Cresselia which at best could be Psychic/Fairy. Celebi and is time travelling skills are also strongly related to its psyhic powers, so are Jirachi wishing skills.
>fairy dunsparceWhole movepool is basically Normal type, a lore and crypt animal doesn't have to be obbligatory a fairy.
>fairy ninetalesMay pass, either Fire/Ghost or Fire/Psychic legend and movepool based, Fairy would be a good subtype but Ninetales itself has an empty Fairy movepool.
>fairy ledianWell, that's something. Fixes its type and ladybugs themselves don't gly that high to be flying type in my opinion.
>fairy luvdiscIt's a kind pest that spreads love, might work theme wise.
>miloticIt's alright as it is, Psychic powers look more predominant but eh.
>banshee maymayHere we go again, if it is a mythical creatures that it must be Fairy type too. Same pink and cute mons logic after Fairy type.
