>>23466489It's not that I'm against the idea of a more action-oriented Pokémon game as a spinoff, but
>better platformYou seem to want to try to take a franchise partially owned by Nintendo away from Nintendo platforms because of graphics.
>bethesdaAnd this is where you're an idiot. As other anons have already stated, Bethesda games are buggy unfinished messes that require extensive modding to make decent.
You also seem to want these changes to go to the main game instead of a spinoff, which is something that I see a lot of people want to do with a lot of different changes. Pokémon is a turn-based JRPG and should always stay one. We have spinoffs for people who want something different out of a Pokémon game, we have a dungeon crawler, several types of puzzle game, Pokémon Snap is essentially a rail shooter, we have Ranger, Rumble, all games that change up the gameplay of Pokémon without taking away from the people that like the turn-based JRPG gameplay of the main games.
So, tl;dr, Wii U graphics are fine for something cartoony like Pokémon, Bethesda fucking sucks, and this is more suited for a spinoff rather than a "be all, end all" Pokémon game.
