>>24683582Most of them are fine, only few of them aren't exactly in my type. But your "Normal type" choices are quite interesting. 8.5/10
>>24683751Too much for me, gonna r8 by "all"
7.5/10
>>24683797Not taking into consideration your hate list. 7/10
>>24683911Same, only by "all". Quite amazing Amongus is someone's favourite. 7/10
>>24683932I think it's quite okay, 7/10
>>24683997Victreebell and Walrein is pleasant surprise, overall too much mega/legend mons 6.5/10
>>24684103But I will! Plus for Parasect, 6.5/10
>>24684144Could have been worse, I guess... 5.5/10
>>24684209I have mixed feelings about this one, mix of really good and really odd mons here. But no man who have favourite fighting type Primeape can be a bad man! 7/10
>>24684449Overall quite okay. 7/10
>>24684476Same as up. 7/10
>>24684876Lickilicky, Klinklang, and Dodrio are my issue with this one, I mean it's unreal for someone to actually like them, or so I thought. Rest are quite decent. 6.5/10
>>24685762For a second I thought it was Onix in ground bracket. Mostly good/neutral mons 8.5/10
>>24685856You got quite alot doubles though. 6.5/10
>>24686625You've got some excellent fighting type taste my friend. 7.5/10
>>24686626Flygon is cool and stuff, but it's shiny is soo bad. Generally okay 7.5/10
>>24686732I like your 3th gen, and bonus for Mega Manectric. 6.5/10
>>24687687There are few "eh?" but generally decent. 7.5/10
>>24688108My bro Chesnaught. 7/10
