>>25210448>It looks like a female, so it must be one!Not what I said, I said it clearly looks female, therefore there is justification for the waifuism.
>Implying you're not just calling it female because you can't get laidBeen laid plenty of times, which isn't relevant to the discussion. With that said, I'm calling it female because as of right now it's design is based on a primarily female concept, so much to the point that pokeball is meant to resemble a dress. The fact that despite it's robotic and man-made tendencies it clearly has femininity. That and there is no confirmation whatsoever that it is a Legendary or not. Even then, there are Legendaries with Genders, very few, but there are some.
If it turns out to be Legendary, then fine, it's genderless, but it still looks incredibly feminine and gives justification for those that wish to waifu Pokemon. If it turns out it has a gender, and it's male only, then that's fine too, but it still has clear feminine design choices.
If you wish to engage in an actual discussion try to be intelligent instead of spouting memes and green-texting constantly, because it makes you look like nothing more than a complete child and retard. But I expect more green-text and 'muh trolling'.
