/vp/ - Pokémon » Thread #25218281

[33 / 5 / ?]

417KiB, 640x480, baby_kangaskhan.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 15:07:38 No.25218281 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>25218603 >>25219078 >>25220051

How did we go from this...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO mega_kangaskhan_by_fer_gon-d6hl7qe.jpg, 176KiB, 530x633

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 15:09:09 No.25218286 Report

Quoted By: >>25218297 >>25218306 >>25218598 >>25218603 >>25218970 >>25218993 >>25219006 >>25219078 >>25219173 >>25219200 >>25220009 >>25220040 >>25220051 >>25220114

... to this?

It looked a lot more realistic in Gen 1.

SigroS

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO gvrk.jpg, 33KiB, 454x500

SigroS Sat 13 Feb 2016 15:10:59 No.25218297 Report

Quoted By: >>25218604

>>25218286
That's awful. I don't understand why they couldn't stick with his original form

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 15:12:52 No.25218306 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
That's just its mega form. Normal kanga's baby looks more like the first picture when in the pouch.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 15:17:08 No.25218333 Report

Quoted By: >>25218571

When a Kangaskhan hatches, it's already a mother!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 15:59:15 No.25218571 Report

Quoted By: >>25218584

>>25218333
The "baby" is actually a male kangaskhan. They work like angler fish.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:01:55 No.25218584 Report

Quoted By: >>25218591 >>25218597

>>25218571
But if that's so, why do I need put another mon in the daycare?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:03:23 No.25218591 Report

Quoted By: >>25218601

>>25218584
Same reason you don't have a baby with your sibling.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:04:01 No.25218597 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218584
They're exhibitionists

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:04:23 No.25218598 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286

That's the baby's Mega form. Mega Kangaskhan is the baby Mega Evolving and getting out of its mother's pouch.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:05:15 No.25218601 Report

Quoted By: >>25218618 >>25219023

>>25218591
The whole point of a male angler is to provide sperm though. What's being provided here?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:05:32 No.25218603 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218281
Uguu kawaii

>>25218286
Looks like a baby Kangaskhan. What the fuck are you talking about?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:05:59 No.25218604 Report

Quoted By: >>25219679

>>25218297
>muh autistic cubone headcanon

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 16:08:29 No.25218618 Report

Quoted By: >>25219023

>>25218601
words of encouragement and emotional support

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 17:26:51 No.25218970 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
Mega Stones and Ohmura.

To be fair, it's GameFreaks' fault for not having the foresight in the first place.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 17:32:41 No.25218993 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
neither of them look realistic
I like the old one better, still

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 17:36:29 No.25219006 Report

Quoted By: >>25219224

>>25218286
>realistic
That term doesn't mean what you think it means.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 17:39:18 No.25219023 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218601
>>25218618
50% damage boost

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 17:47:39 No.25219078 Report

Quoted By: >>25219148 >>25219243

>>25218286
Why does all the artwork post-gen II look so "clean" and "sanitized"? Honestly looks like it was generated by a computer rather than drawn by human hands like >>25218281

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:00:21 No.25219148 Report

Quoted By:

>>25219078

Drawing digitally is cheaper than drawing by hand

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:05:11 No.25219173 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
It looks almost exactly like its mother, but hey stylised design is only okay when older pokemon do it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:08:50 No.25219200 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
Are you people stupid? It's a "kid" version of the little baby almost fetus in Kangaskhan's pouch because it Mega Evolved.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:13:00 No.25219224 Report

Quoted By: >>25219320

>>25219006
>old one has beady eyes like an actual kangaroo instead of le animu eyes they overuse on pokemon now
>doesn't have blush stickers

no it means exactly what he thinks

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:16:04 No.25219243 Report

Quoted By:

>>25219078
The OP picture is a cel and was drawn by human hands, the second one isn't even the official art used for Mega Kangaskhan and is digitally produced.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:27:03 No.25219320 Report

Quoted By: >>25219340

>>25219224
Wrong, because you're ignoring context which was exactly my point.

I bet you're one of those people who sling the word "literally" around every other sentence. Hilarious.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 18:30:06 No.25219340 Report

Quoted By:

>>25219320
Ignoring context of what? There is no other context to follow. OP said the old one is more realistic and it is. I don't see what the issue is here.

SigroS

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Still liking Rapidash.png, 26KiB, 642x460

SigroS Sat 13 Feb 2016 19:31:17 No.25219679 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218604
No appreciation for nostalgia & secrets

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 20:32:23 No.25220009 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
This is the Mega Evolved form of Baby Kangaskhan. That's why it looks different. It's not a difficult concept.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 20:39:11 No.25220040 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
>>25218286
It is more anime-style. Which is opinably better or worse, depending on your taste.

Also, it is the Mega form of the baby, you unculturated faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 20:40:36 No.25220051 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218281
Baby

>>25218286
Child

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 115Kangaskhan-Mega.png, 298KiB, 424x513

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 20:49:04 No.25220114 Report

Quoted By:

>>25218286
Here's the official art of the Baby-Megaskhan, I think that the more defined eye makes it looks more like the mother (more older in another words), so I don't see the problem.

I like the concept and design of Mega Kangaskhan but I really didn't expected Parental Bond to be so broken at the point of dominate the meta game.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 21:01:12 No.25220180 Report

Quoted By: >>25220251

So what was with the design choice of Baby Kangaskhan not being a separate baby Pokemon like a lot of others?

Is this the only Pokemon that physically grows barring evolutions/Megas?

Also what is with the design choice of Nidoqueen not being able to breed, but Nidoran and Nidorina being able too? And the design choice not to combine the two, and just have differences/evolutions based solely on gender, like they did with Ralts?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Feb 2016 21:13:37 No.25220251 Report

Quoted By:

>>25220180
>design choice
It's not. It's a holdover of gamefreak's poor programming in gen II they're too lazy to fix.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches