>>25344221>In what fucking parallel universe,This one apparently or are you forgetting all of the people complaining about how jarring it was to go from 60fps to 30 and why it was 30 on a stronger system?
How about all the complaints about pokemon being unavailable?
And the complaints about their being no battle frontier when RS had the tower?
I could go on if you ever look at a magazine around that time you will see how many people wrote in saying how bad it was with hundreds of complaints.
>Famitsu even gave it a perfect 40 iircFamitsu did, and do you know what other pokemon got a high score? X and Y with 39.
Using your logic how is that "poorly recieved"
In any case we're referring to the fans, the people that matter. The people they make games from and get money from. The people who flooded early message boards with the complaints seen above as well as gen 5's only new pokemon complaint.
>>25344270Fun fact: Pokemon Ruby and Sapphire were the best selling game on the GBA and sold about 16 mil.
On a system that was extremely popular dwarfing the GBA in numbers selling only a paltry 2m more than the previous iteration is an utter joke.
X and Y are much, much more popular than diamond and pearl because, on a system that still has yet to sell more than the GBA, it has numbers rivaling RSE and BW.
Get your shit together and see reality because SALES =/= QUALITY for the last time you colossal retard.
