>>26502090>But there has been plenty of evidence stacked against them>EvidenceLet me have it then.
Oh no, wait, you're saying that these so called evidences are things merely pointed out by people in various posts and comments?
That's cute.
You know, people can be right.
But at the same time, they can be AWFULLY wrong too. Just look at the way how people were judging the 5th gen leaks back then, going to such lengths to make actual "evidence" to make them look as if they were fake.
This clearly isn't the same kind of leak we're dealing with, but there's about a chance of it being real as there is a chance of them being fake. No one really fucking knows their shit until the truth finally comes out and people go out of their way to make a speech about how "right" they were.
At the time being, I'm in between the middle. Chances are, they MIGHT be fake, but there's always that possibility of these shitty leaks proving us wrong.
Actually, just to point out ONE thing.
At first glance, these might look as if these were taken photos of a computer screen. I thought so too.
But ever since the first stage of Popplio got out (the jester one), I noticed THAT one fucking line in a part of the white background.
That ain't a computer screen either. Most likely scenario, either the images printed or some sort of reference book. Who the fuck knows, but the images are actually in some form of paper.
See, I can be wrong. Anyone can be wrong about these, don't just take everything a person says as actual facts, chances are, the evidence aren't either sufficient or simply made up. It's like forged evidence in a crime scene, it doesn't really help at all getting to the bottom of it all. The point is, that doesn't mean we can't compile ALL the already existing proof and evidences of these leaks and make sure they're actually concrete and believable instead of simply jumping into conclusions and take a person's word for it.
