>>26582357>X/Y better than Gen 1Definitely.
>X/Y better than D/PMeh. I still like D/P more because there was more challenge, but at the same time, D/P felt way slower. On the other hand, though, X/Y has slow, boring moments too. I'd call them even, but I wouldn't call either of them a solid pokemon game.
>Gen 3Nah. Gen 3 vastly improved the series and had a lot of great things X/Y didn't. Of course, Gen 3 had its own flaws, but its nowhere near being worse than X/Y. Gen 3 had solid games all around; decent challenge by Pokemon standards, Emerald providing a huge amount of end-game content, and good remakes with FR/LG. Hoenn may not be a very good region, but frankly, I liked it a lot more than Kalos. Not to mention that all of Gen 6 was without an endgame, was a whole new league of easy (even by pokemon standards), and gave really shitty remakes with ORAS.
I don't mind if you enjoyed X/Y, but saying they were better than Gen 3 is just wrong.
>inb4 "nostalgiafag"