>>266934451. That face is more like a sparrow than a barn owl by a huge margin.
2. you can't call the other a mutant and ignore this one's weird plump feather fingers and if you try to use another pokemon defense, I can easily point to Blaziken an ACTUAL STARTER.
3. Past it's Bow and arrow archer set up it has nothing else going for it seeing as it came over a week after Huntshoot which was the first hooded dark faced Rowel evo to date So if they're both fake you can't take inspiration from another artist work and use that as a point to why yours is better if you're takng the guy's ideas to for your points.
Past that here's your Comparison
Robinhoot:
Archer motif
Leaf Bow evolving to a drawstring or it's hood.
Feathers turning from sharp blades to arrows.
Combination of drawstring and wing arch to simulate a bow and arrow.
+1 I'll give it a bonus point for being original and well executed in unison
Huntshoot:
Hunter Motif
The Original Hood and shadow face.
It complements it's hood and shadow face with Night vision ringed eyes
Historical theme thematic with aristocratic assassins.
Leaves on body wrapping to simulate clothing as a vest and cloak.
RH: 5 HH: 5
>>26693410Yea that's why there Leaks, Ballio and co had 1 body images and if they had english Bios they would've been instantly called fakes, this guy has full pages with doodles forcing the point across so, if he just has his standing there with various poses you wouldn't give them dick nor knew the bird has an arrow or the tiger's belt shot fire, like you knew Golurk can turn into a cannon and fly just from it's main art piece..
I bet you're the same guy who doesn't notice something instantly then reads up a pokemon's trivia facts and go "Omg I never realized that, good job GF it's good design" and is now saying design thematic doesn't matter. stfu.
