>>26844741Nice linework and good design. It'd look awkward moving around, though.
>>26847156Kind of uninspired, terrible palette. Vomit and purple don't go together, not to mention the red eye.
>>26847168Fortrough is good. Buckit looks and sounds to much like a normal bucket. Make it more stylized.
>>26848399Thicc/10
>>26849206The first one is great both design and color wise. The patterns on the second one could be removed for something better looking.
>>26850362Looks really good. Using it as a lore explanation for early-series awkward typing is stupid though.
>>26850396Doesn't look even remotely like a pokemon. The way the eyes protrude beyond the body is strange, the color palette is all over the place, and having a bunch of bugs present completely detached from the anthill wouldn't work. I'll give you that it's a very good concept.
>>26850409Very good, I like how actual fruit patterns are incorporated into the design. Barely any flaws at all.
>>26850417I don't know where to start. First, make sure the level of detail and complexity of the design is consistent throughout. You have a shell with no features that takes up most of the design, and a small detailed eyes and mouth below. Look at the existing pokemon designs.
>>26850425Doesn't look like it'd be a pokemon. The big, glistening eyes is not something they do a lot.
>>26850438Pretty solid. It'd look awkward in 3D, though; I don't know if it's supposed to be round or flat and if the chunk of rock is part of the pokemon there's no way it'd move.
>>26850447The spiky chunks of rock are unnecessary. Otherwise solid.
>>26850474Good design, the tail being that long is unnecessary though. Maybe have the white fur going down it's chest continue and go around the legs to become a tail. And delibird shouldn't have a counterpart.
